Hyeree Ro, Seseri, 2018, Performance, 9 min 30 sec © Hyeree Ro

Sculpture and installation often make me think about the ways in which time can be contained. Sculpture or installation itself is generally perceived as something that remains still in place. Yet even without producing direct physical movement, as in kinetic sculpture, movement may arise around the sculpture, or the work itself may operate as a performative sign, allowing an immobile sculpture or installation to be experienced as an event. When a sculpture carries a narrative or becomes a state onto which shifting signs are projected—and when events occur through the gestures and speech surrounding it—the stillness of sculpture extends into time.

Performance often intervenes as a device that activates the state of a visual work within time. It also functions when one wishes to superimpose a story or condition onto objects. Hyeree Ro likewise takes sculpture or installation as a foundation and, by adding gesture and speech, transforms a static scene into the time of an event. If we break down what fills that time, it can largely be filtered into objects, body, and language. By examining these elements one by one, and then observing how they meet, collide, and pass by one another, we may attempt to approach the artist’s work.

 
Objects

Objects are the starting point of Hyeree Ro’s practice. (The artist seems to prefer the term “objet.”) From these points, a web of speech and movement is woven. The objects range from readily available mass-produced materials—plywood, timber, tubes, plastic—to things that are discarded or found, such as stones, shells, or food peels. These materials acquire form through cutting and joining while retaining their original properties and colors, without major alterations such as painting.

Although raw materials are shaped into forms, they do not evoke specific objects or symbols, and therefore do not generate a specific narrative. In other words, there may be a hole, but it does not point to a cup. Remaining largely abstract, these objects, when arranged or layered in space, compose a scene of lines and planes much like a drawing made with a pen. Such abstraction also guarantees the possibility that the objects may later connect freely with many different stories. The objects also tend to have forms that a person can easily move.

Rather than possessing heavy weight or precariously stacked structures, they are composed of materials and sizes that allow light movement and suggest a certain elasticity. Some objects consist of large and small plywood surfaces connected by hinges; when folded down they are flat, but when erected they become three-dimensional. Like Lygia Clark’s Bichos, these objects possess a slight animal-like quality in that their form can autonomously change in response to the hands that hold them. It is the artist herself who manipulates them; the audience is not allowed to touch the objects.

 
Body

The body moves objects while at the same time traveling among them according to its own narrative agency and decisions. The space in which this body moves is usually limited. Rather than using a wide stage, the body moves within a close radius centered on the arranged objects. Because Ro’s objects are generally a series of small elements, the area through which the body moves is also relatively confined. In the performance documentation video Meeting the Ceiling (2013), for example, the space used is the narrow gap between the mattress of a bunk bed and the ceiling—so low that one cannot raise the body upright.

Maintaining contact between the ceiling and the body, the performance unfolds almost like contact improvisation in dance. With the rule that once a part of the body touches the ceiling it cannot touch it again, the performance continues only for as long as the performer can maintain this condition. It is a work that responds with one’s own irregular body to the fixed plane of the ceiling while concentrating on the sensation of bodily movement. A noticeable feature of the body in Ro’s performances is the frequent appearance of bending. The artist’s body, which moves objects, often appears in folded positions—bending, crouching, kneeling.

This emerges partly because the body moves within the constraints of a restricted space, and partly because these are the specific postures required to activate objects. Particularly in the performance LA-sung (2016–2017), when the artist looks at and moves objects, it gives the impression of observing a diorama or a miniature landscape. Like a child building a town with blocks and murmuring through role-play, when the artist moves the objets while recounting fragmented stories from the past, the objects become both tools that assist narration and evidence of memory.
 

Body and Objects

A performance begins by searching for ways to connect the arranged objects with the body. When the movement of the body is combined with the rigid materials of objects—such as wood or plastic—the performer reads the points of connection between them and seeks out the points where they resist one another. The body plays the role of moving objects, yet at times it also extends the movement of objects. Rather than imitating the physical properties of objects, however, the body finds points of connection with them through the artist’s own distinctive rhythm and mode of bodily movement. Instead of employing trained, technical gestures, the body reveals the inherent qualities of its own movement.

The choreography emerges through the alternating use of two approaches: preserving the form and manner of the artist’s own movement, and adding functional gestures that operate objects. In the relationship between body and objects, William Forsythe proposed the concept of the “choreographic object,” describing installations of objects as devices that encourage viewers to move their own bodies and generate choreography themselves. In that context, the emphasis lies on objects assisting bodily movement. In Hyeree Ro’s performances, however, body and objects move back and forth between the positions of subject and object.

 
Language

As language is gradually added to performances that negotiate between body and space through connection and resistance, the work unfolds more centrally around narrative. The words within the performances have uneven contours. Sentences are often left incomplete, and various words whose relationships before and after remain ambiguous appear and are replaced within a single scene. The speech, largely monologic, moves between dialogue and explanation. The tone of voice, devoid of emotional inflection, is dry, almost like reading a book. Just as the artist uses materials in their raw state when working with objects, she uses the qualities of language without processing them.

In particular, she frequently utilizes the different textures of different languages. By mixing English and Korean, or Japanese and Korean, she conveys the collision of linguistic textures while simultaneously alternating between revealing and concealing meaning. As if adjusting the volume of music, clearer meanings and those that are more deliberately obscured diverge according to the choice of language. In recent works, autobiographical narratives have appeared. The familial relationship between father and daughter emerges, along with words referring to specific places such as LA and particular events.

Yet the story is never fully unfolded. At the point where the sentence trails off, one can only imagine the complex emotions surrounding the event. If in LA-sung the father and daughter appeared as opposing figures, then in the performance Sandosi (2017), produced during a residency in Japan, the two participants (the artist and a local resident) appear as a series of oppositional pairings: someone in their seventies and someone in their thirties, man and woman, Japanese and Korean, audience member and artist, retired pensioner and precarious laborer. This, too, remains a sequence of incomplete dialogues. Kneeling across from one another almost as if performing a ritual, their movements partially convey the story through the form of objects, while language carries another portion of it.

 
The Body, Objects, and Language

“The body circles around the objets, and movements linking body and object meet the script, where they are selected and revised once again.”
“Not this or that, but the possibility of a body and a place that are this and that at the same time.”
 

Objects Before and After Performance

Unfortunately, I have never seen the artist’s performances in person. Everything I say about these performances is based on what I have seen on screen. The artist’s posture of sitting bent over, as it appears on screen, may simply seem more pronounced because it fills the camera frame. The objects arranged on the floor may appear close in the lens, yet in reality it is impossible to know how large the surrounding empty space outside the artist’s body and objects might be, or how that open outdoor space may have prepared the viewer’s senses.

One cannot know the parts omitted from the performance documentation—for instance, how the artist entered or exited the scene, what temperature the midday air held on that day, or how the words spoken in the performance dispersed through the air. This connects to the question of how an artist who works simultaneously with objects and events, and who presents both performance and exhibition, negotiates the differing temporalities of these two forms. What meaning do objects hold before and after performance?

To what extent are the objects left in the exhibition connected to the performance, and do they acquire independent meaning once the performance has ended? Or do they remain strongly entangled with gestures and speech as signs that recall the performance? So far, when the artist performs within an exhibition, she has often chosen to record the performance and present it alongside the sculptures as a form of documentation. Is this merely a secondary option, and if so, what might be the primary method still waiting to be explored?

 
New Work — Seseri

The title of the artist’s new work introduced in the Pool Lab exhibition 《Jungle Gym》 is Seseri. “Seseri” refers to chicken neck meat, one among the many finely distinguished names used for different parts of a chicken. Like Sandosi (2017), this work reflects the artist’s recent personal experiences and thoughts formed through traveling between Japan and Korea. Just as the word “neck meat” unexpectedly evokes a chilling sensation, the artist contemplates the connection between everyday acts such as eating and the idea of death.

In particular, she recalls the differences in historical understanding that she newly discovered with surprise in the everyday contexts of Japan and Korea, as well as the shadows of violence or threat embedded within daily life. Whether these reflections will yet be articulated as a concrete narrative within the work remains uncertain. As in Sandosi, where two markedly different individuals were placed face to face, she once again attempts to confront things that seem unable to meet: inside and outside, piece and whole, plane and volume, individual and history, life and death, front and back, and so on.

A list of such oppositions is presented and followed within objects, installation performance, and video. This work introduces several new attempts compared to the artist’s previous works. First, the background of the place where objects are installed is defined as a clear plane. Second, a voice is continuously placed in the space as sound, installed separately from the video. The sound is not subordinate to the video but exists as one element of the installation. The materiality of sound may highlight the sense of event and temporality within the fixed landscape of arranged objects.

At the opening of the exhibition, the artist will perform. It will be an opportunity to look more closely at the experience that became the starting point of Seseri. Instead of leaving a record of the performance in the exhibition space, she has chosen to install separate sound and video elements within the installation itself as a new attempt and modification of her practice. In doing so, she may be experimenting with a way for objects to exist both in conjunction with performance and as independent entities. One can anticipate and hope for such a possibility.

References