Installation view of 《L·A·P·S·E》 (CR Collective, 2022) ©CR Collective

Do highly advanced extraterrestrials exist? Can Earth’s inhabitants migrate to other habitable planets or colonise alien planets? What was once a distant science fiction fantasy depicted in movies has now become a tangible and realistic task centered on the conquest of space. In Stanley Kubrick’s film 2001: A Space Odyssey, released 55 years ago, astronauts heading to Jupiter encounter a mysterious giant black monolith. Though its purpose is unclear, the AI accompanying them, HAL, attacks the humans.

The enigmatic black monolith in the film, referred to as a “monolith,” has since come to symbolise either a tool of aliens or a highly advanced computer. If we were to identify a monolith in 2023, it might take the form of globally iconic obelisks or cutting-edge quantum computers that are redefining U.S.–China competition with their immense power and destructive potential. The monolith represents not only a mysterious symbol of human power but also the idea of a vast, singular organisation—a single block of stone. Just as the malfunctioning (or possibly self-evolving) AI in the film attacked humans, today’s algorithms and AI systems reveal a constant potential for threats: they invade personal information, infringe on physical autonomy, control, and even subordinate humanity, possibly leading to ultimate destruction.

While we rely on high-tech advancements like human cloning, Neuralink, and autonomous robots for convenience, we are simultaneously confronted with the fundamental harms they introduce. The increasing emphasis on binary thinking and universal standards—pursuing only national or corporate interests and efficiency—amplifies concerns about societal and capitalist power structures.

In 2023, artist Jang Jinseung’s 《Data Monolith》 addresses these pressing “discourses on future humanity.” On the artist’s website (http://jinseungjang.com/data-monolith/), information about his past works, designs, exhibitions, and performances is archived alongside the Data Monolith project. The site, featuring a pulsating Data Monolith logo, is divided into four sections (Monolith I, II, III, IV). Clicking on the respective icons—buildings, white triangles, emptiness, and semiconductor chips—teleports users (and their avatars) to specific locations.

Monolith I leads to the location of an open seminar, where seminar content and documents are erected like a monolith. Monolith II transports users past a machine-filled space to an icy, snow-covered surface reminiscent of Earth’s ice age. Monolith III takes users to a primordial, black void shaped like a rectangular ring. Monolith IV moves them into a space filled with massive machines resembling an alternative form of humanity. Scrolling further down the webpage reveals content divided into ten chapters, such as “Data,” “Image Data,” “Text Data,” “Data from Computers, Smartphones, and the Internet,” and others. The text progresses to “Big Data,” “Data and Politics,” “Data of Artificial Life,” “Quantum Computers and Simulation Data,” “Human Self-Destruction,” and concludes with “The Resurrection of the Image” and the Data Monolith.

It documents this progression in a uniform format, akin to recording divine acts, making the website both a designed archive of Jang Jinseung’s work and a monolith itself. Unlike Mioon’s Art Solaris (2016–2020), which tackled the taboo topic of “cartels in the art world” using big data, Jang Jinseung’s Data Monolith explores the structures and conditions of data discourse. Beyond relational aesthetics, it suggests speculative thinking and interpretation through the concept of a “one-to-many transversing multiplicity.”

Reflecting current trends, 《Data Monolith》 adopts the format of an online exhibition. Instead of traditional showcases, workshops and discussions were conducted with participants and avatars on the web page and the metaverse platform Spatial. The open seminar, themed around “contemporary data ontology and data phenomenology,” featured contributions from writers and researchers. The resulting process—culminating in an analog monolith print—tackled contemporary debates on topics like data, multiplicity and sensation, and the universality and taboos of science. Rather than concluding optimistically or pessimistically, it revealed societal problems hidden beneath an open-ended narrative.

Through collaborative discussions, the exhibition format reflected a respect for individual opinions while reinforcing objectivity through public debate. It also sought to counter criticisms of Jang’s work as overly complex and opaque, presenting an alternative approach. This can be seen as the artist’s attempt to navigate and adapt to the evolving language of art exhibitions. Jang Jinseung expressed concerns during the Data Monolith discussions: “I often feel this project is difficult because it doesn’t offer clear answers. It’s challenging to portray the future concretely, nor do I aim to map out a programmatic blueprint. What concerns me is how to navigate through the broader macro-context, what role the individual (artist) plays, and how far our (imagination and) senses can extend through personal devices like smartphones.”

Professor Lee Kwangsuk’s contribution highlighted the historical evolution of “data” terminology in Korea, covering issues like social dynamics, economic concerns, and the trajectory of data-driven capitalism. Distinguishing between weak intelligence (AI) and artificial general intelligence (AGI), Lee forecasted a bleak future with AGI and proposed balancing human-machine relations while addressing the opportunities and problems of the emerging data-driven society. However, even with advanced technology, unresolved issues such as manufacturing costs and social inequalities persist. Jang Jinseung’s Data Monolith is a reflection of his ongoing artistic exploration of the relationship between new material and immaterial technologies and humanity, offering questions and knowledge to escape societal constraints. It aims to dismantle life patterns shaped by algorithms and AI, posing alternative inquiries into human freedom. In doing so, Jang’s work continues to evolve.

References