It is not only the elderly or the sick who can speak of collapse. If we can imagine daily life—the domain of the ordinary—as a kind of landscape, then I can sequentially picture borders that crumble at every moment, razor-sharp coldness, pedestrian paths where dividing lines are nearly erased, old overpasses that have either collapsed or are waiting to fall, exposed steel frames and plaster buildings, administrative districts with skeletal facades. These places were perpetually in the midst of collapse, and an end—unprovoked by anyone—had already arrived of its own accord. It wasn’t particularly unfair or upsetting. There wasn’t enough composure to even look for who was responsible. It was accepted as natural. There were even moments when I thought, “So this is how I die.” During a study session last winter, we read Hito Steyerl’s “Free Fall – A Thought on Vertical Perspective” together (since it had not yet been published in Korean, the presenter translated the English original in real-time). Understanding this new visual perspective was not difficult at all. For those who are perpetually in free fall, everything appears to be endlessly collapsing. That’s because the surface upon which one could stand is missing.

The image of “ruins” is frequently cited in Korea, regardless of whether it’s literature or visual art. It seems we have yet to find a better term to describe the landscape of contemporary art. I can’t even begin to guess how many years this worn-out consensus has managed to survive. All I know is that it continues to be reproduced, endlessly borrowed from the mouths of countless speakers. Even that night, as we read Steyerl’s text together, we imagined ruins that had nearly lost their ground, and in doing so, we shared a similar sense of collapse. Outside the building where the study was held, one of our colleagues lit a cigarette and asked, “So, what can we do?” Though the question was posed in jest, everyone fell silent. As we hesitated to answer, another colleague responded first. “We endure.” Smiling, he pushed his black-rimmed glasses up with his thin, bony fingers. He was the type who habitually borrowed various gestures to assist his explanations.

These days, I sometimes deliberately avoid going to exhibitions, but back when such outings still felt like leisure, I enjoyed categorizing certain painters as I pleased, misinterpreting them on my own terms. If there was a single criterion, it was simply that they belonged to my generation—the '80s and '90s. The reason I chose such a clumsy and approximate age group, instead of more reasonable and legitimate classifications, was simple. I wanted to fully understand the landscapes that my contemporaries in other mediums were observing with care, and how those landscapes were combined within the fixed format of a pictorial plane. Furthermore, I was curious about how those compositions formed trends—or at least reflected an awareness of trends. The reason it had to be my generation was because they and I were falling together. I wanted to observe how they endured the uncertain horizons, the constantly self-betraying geographical orders, the vanishing images of still life—all of this dizziness and nausea. If it were possible to reduce the impact of the fall through some kind of attitude alone, I thought that might help me continue my own work in good health.


Son Hyunseon, Shape of Motion, 2015 © Son Hyunseon 3)

I first encountered Son Hyunseon’s paintings during the last winter of 2015. At the time, I happened to visit Seongbuk Art Creation Center, where the exhibition 《Future Style 展》, organized in collaboration with the Korea National University of Arts, was underway. The imagined future presented by the exhibition was based on Hiroki Azuma's “Database Consumption Theory.” Inside the exhibition space, I received the works like two-dimensional prophecies or three-dimensional monuments. Each of them maintained their respective volumes as a kind of greeting to an era yet to arrive.

Even back then, Son Hyunseon was exhibiting ceiling fans. Several paintings depicted ceiling fans either spinning or stationary, installed in different architectural interiors. The title Shape of Motion, printed discreetly in small font on the caption, caught my eye immediately. It conveyed a sense of honesty and decisiveness. In the same space, the works of Kim Jungtae and Neonim Express were installed—both had manually transformed the digital resolutions of floating jpg and gif images found online, intuitively recalling the exhibition’s theme. Even if art of the future amounts to no more than temporarily promised, fictional imagery, the fact that these works identified arbitrary coordinates and documented them meant that each could still serve as a visual mapping resource.

Yet, Son Hyunseon’s paintings seemed to stand apart, isolated from the vividly or roughly rendered works around them. The rows of ceiling fan paintings, installed with unwavering distance and order, differed fundamentally from Kim Jungtae’s method of layering various frames atop each other or assembling them into compound values, and also diverged from Neonim Express’s obsessive translation of politically charged sentiments into images. What I felt when I first confronted Son Hyunseon’s paintings was not delight or astonishment but perplexity. The paintings demanded an independent mode of viewing, as much as they dealt with their own painterly themes.

For instance, one could admire the pictorial techniques composed with the grammar of graphic editing software, feel déjà vu from digital landscapes reimagined with physical materials, question the boundaries of painting by gauging the paper through fragmented shapes and symbols, or take several steps away from attempts to reassemble Seoul with construction materials and abandoned buildings. But while standing in front of the paintings, no particular awareness or knowledge was required. All the viewer needed to do was endure—that was all.

The same was true when I visited the current exhibition: all I had to do was endure for a long time. Over two years, the subject had shifted from ceiling fans to concrete mixer trucks. After briefly reading the exhibition leaflet placed next to the guest book—and hesitating whether to sign my name—I eventually wrote it down. The phrase “the idea of everything that rotates,” mentioned in the introduction, lingered in my mind. Was it because this expression neatly dismissed Son Hyunseon’s paintings? Or was it because the phrase precisely struck the core of Son’s paintings?

When I first saw the ceiling fan series, I had to invent countless explanations on the spot, as that felt necessary to understand and process Son Hyunseon’s paintings. Paintings that demand explanation. Most exhibition statements are intended as verbal guides to help audiences comprehend the work, but for some reason, the more I read statements about Son’s paintings, the more elusive they became. (The statement for 《Future Style 展》 in 2015 described the work as “an attempt to visualize the sensibility of ‘future style’ by presenting surfaces where depth has vanished, through depicting objects of repetitive motion, eliminating the central axis and leaving only movement.”) One of the few explanations I managed to formulate back then resembled the statement from this exhibition: perhaps this artist is interested in the essential rhythm of objects. Perhaps that’s why they painted not stationary but rotating ceiling fans. In fact, Son’s paintings of rotating objects directly depict pictorial elements proportional to speed—such as trajectories and blurs. Yet all three explanations sounded more like commentary on Son Hyunseon than on the paintings themselves.

Therefore, this time I tried to conjure explanations solely about Son Hyunseon’s paintings, without the artist. Standing alone in front of the paintings for as long as I could—this was the first time I managed that. Inside the gallery, emptied of visitors, the space appeared defined only by light and shadow. A middle-aged man with subtly different expressions stood at intervals like the paintings, as did ceiling fans, some still and some rotating, as did the concrete truck series—at a glance resembling moon craters or smooth-surfaced bas-reliefs—and the ceiling fan series installed inside the glass windows, visible only from outside the building. I tried to endure them all. Especially the outdoor works, located near the road, constantly exposed me to danger, which somehow heightened my sense of endurance. Every time I was pushed away and returned to my spot, I could grasp the sensation of the waves.

In the process of enduring before the paintings, accumulating time, forgetting and remembering repeatedly, I was the wave, the wind, the atmosphere, and simultaneously, the feeling itself. Plausible explanations pressuring quick understanding were gradually denied, one by one, in a calm sequence. Eventually, only the paintings and I remained.

Suddenly, a thought stirred my vacant mind. I opened my messenger and sent myself this sentence:

“There comes a moment when I get confused—whether the essential rhythm of this object is a tremor, or whether my heart is trembling, making it appear so.”

If I were a sphere, everything would appear to be rotating while I’m spinning. Not only objects, but even the horizon itself. Just like how, for someone in constant free fall, everything seems to collapse moment by moment. So, what can we do? When I ask again the same question I once heard, I am spinning endlessly in a horizontal or vertical direction. Because of the rotation speed, my words cannot be delivered intact. The person listening to the question must infer the missing segments on their own.

We e-n-d-u-r-e.

Someone answers, their face tilted to one side. Even while vomiting from nausea, they nod their head.

We e-n-d-u-r-e.

When I return those words, I feel deeply melancholic. Is it because I can no longer return them?

As I left the building and headed toward Hongdae Entrance, I typed “Standstill” into the YouTube search engine. Instead of “Standstill,” the results leaned more toward “Stand still.” It seemed that in English-speaking cultures, this term was mostly used as a song title. As I scrolled down, I found and clicked on the video, “Stand Still [Live]” by The Isaacs.


While listening to the song, I heard these lyrics:


Stand still and let God move,
Standing still is hard to do
When you feel you have reached the end,
He’ll make a way for you
Stand still and let God move


On the way home, I encountered countless spheres precariously leaning on upright skeletal structures. They were endlessly spinning, which made them appear almost expressionless. Perhaps expressionlessness is closer to a state of rotation rather than a state of stillness. Objects moving beyond a certain frame rate can even appear completely still. Like how we mistakenly think we “see” high-speed spinning tires.

It’s extremely rare for me to go see an exhibition alone. Recently, I haven’t even gone out at all. But someone’s advice about “faith” gave me the courage to step out for the first time in a long while. I’m not sure if it’s alright to quote them, but that person said they believe in the painting itself, rather than their own sensibility, talent, or aptitude. Even though they create the work, the painting always exists ahead of them, or behind them. Whenever they feel afraid, they remind themselves: even if I cannot believe in myself, I can believe in the work.

I, on the other hand, have never thought to separate my writing from myself, just because I wrote it. So maybe I’ve been under the illusion that what determines my writing is simply my own sensibility, talent, or aptitude. But as they said, sometimes a work decides itself. Some of the writings my colleagues liked were not good because I wrote them well—the writing itself was good. Thinking that way means there’s no need to be humble or arrogant. All that’s needed is a body that can honestly endure.

These days, when I close my eyes, I no longer hear Basinski or Bizet’s music. Instead, K’s voice, repeating calibration phrases into a closed-circuit video device, overlaps like polyphonic music, echoing here and there:

interlinked.
I need to treat my writing and myself as independent units.
within cells.

While enduring, I should not wait for a benevolent god or an experienced guide, but instead focus more deeply and closely on the landscape of collapse, the Generation-scape, and the sensation of falling that defines my generation.

My fellow companions, who are falling with me, ask:
So, what can we do?
Spinning, I answer:
We e-n-d-u-r-e.
Everyone is enduring, without compensation. Falling. Without tension. As if it’s only natural. Or imagining, underfoot, a ground that disappeared long ago. Now saying, foolishly: everything is collapsing.

The intercity bus No. 1008, departing every 30 minutes from Sadang, traces the straight roads connecting my home to Sadang. There are no detours. It stops just once at the Uiwang Expressway tollgate. If you board during off-peak hours, you have to press the bell within 20 minutes. On the bus, all I do is listen to music and look out the window. During the day, I see the scenery outside. But at night, I see my own face.

On the bus ride home, I can’t help but glance at my face reflected at an angle.

In the midst of everything spinning, I am the sphere striving to endure the nausea, standing still.



1. Image Source: http://chapterii.org/chapter-ii-window-4/
2. Hito Steyerl, Expulsion from the Screen, translated by Kim Silbi, Workroom Press, 2016
3. Image Source: https://neolook.com/archives/20151213h
4. The Isaacs – Stand Still [Live] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlBFlEup9Uc


References