The whites of the eyes exposed in an angry glare, sharply raised eyebrows, freckles lightly scattered across the cheeks close to the nose, unruly hair jutting out, a sneering mouth with pouting lips, assertive teeth, bulging flesh, a heavy-set frame, and unshaven body hair left as is—these are the images that come to mind when thinking of Shin Min’s work. Sculpted with carefully, yet somewhat clumsily drawn lines and forms, her figures brim with a distinct sense of humor. However, contrary to their seemingly rough but endearing appearance, the fierce eyes and sturdy forearms make her sculptures unforgettable. Eyes that glare or stare boldly upward are filled with anger.

As can be seen in several of her interviews, this anger is the driving force behind her practice. It originates from the social communities to which she belongs—women, art workers, and low-wage, high-intensity laborers. The anger, formed through exposure to homogenized norms, unacknowledged shadow labor, and the cumulative fatigue of emotional labor, is embodied as it passes through the artist’s body. Shin Min expresses the traces left by this emotion through the human form.


Overlaying Letter-Writing onto the Working Environment


Shin Min, Kyungsook, 2006, mixed media, 17×14×13cm ©Shin Min

Her practice ranges from early head sculptures that emphasize the eyes, such as ‘Crying Women’ (2006–2010), to small palm-sized figures like 〈Daughters with Strawberry Noses〉(2011), and eventually to larger, full-bodied sculptures such as 〈Part-Timer in a Dog-Like Posture〉(2014). As her sculptures gradually took on complete bodily forms, Shin Min began to learn how to communicate with the world through the lens of her own memories. Through this process, she began to internalize the question: "What should an artist remain vigilant about when moving beyond the realm of self-representation into socially and ethically engaged work?"

She constantly asks herself, “Who will see my work?” and consciously avoids creating art that might appear to be a “strategic gesture aimed at being cited by feminist critics or aesthetic theorists.”¹ As a practical response to this self-reflection, she chose the act of “writing letters.”² The essence of this practice lies in the fact that letters always presuppose a recipient—an intended destination—and that they can be grounded in care for the other.

Through this method, she not only reinforces the raison d’être of her practice by forming a meta-relationship between the artist and her work but also seeks to establish reciprocal communication with the others implicated in her work. For Shin Min, this becomes a way of maintaining a balanced relationship with the world while also serving as a trigger for amplifying the voices of those within her communities who share similar feelings of anger.
This attitude has been consistently present in Shin Min’s work since the beginning. As she revealed in the preface to her second solo exhibition, 《Daughters with Strawberry Noses》(Place MAK, October 18–30, 2011), she experienced a creative block when her art-making began to feel increasingly subsumed by capitalism’s system of “equivalence.” The more she worked toward fitting her practice into that framework, the more distant she felt from the reasons she had originally started making art. As a way of breaking through this impasse, she turned to a letter-writing practice that reframed her working environment.

The resulting piece, 〈Daughters with Strawberry Noses〉, emerged from the act of making for its own sake. She referred to the small figures she created as her “daughters,” projecting herself onto them while also performing a gesture of care by burning incense and letting the smoke rise through the holes of their sculpted eyes. She describes this as “borrowing the bodies of daughters and sending prayers through incense smoke.”³ These hand-sized girls became vessels through which the artist could express wishes for herself and those around her. Through this process, she gave herself the time to examine her own desires, ultimately confronting why she wanted well-being for herself and her community. Sculpture, for her, became a means to articulate her reason for being as an artist. Since then, letter writing has become a key part of her creative practice and has laid the groundwork for media extensions such as performance, pirate radio broadcasts, and social media writing.



Giving Form to Anger That Moves Through the Body

Shin Min, Part-Time Worker in Downward Dog Pose, 2014, McDonald's French fry bags, colored pencils, boxes, Styrofoam, 308x200x153cm ©Shin Min

In 〈Daughters with Strawberry Noses〉, the artist’s anger is directed inward. Standing at a crossroads where she questioned her identity as an artist, the fact that her labor did not translate into monetary value became a significant point of conflict.⁴ She eventually separated art from paid work, taking a job at McDonald’s and positioning herself as a “hired” worker providing labor in exchange for wages within a social system. There, she experienced the emotional labor demanded by service industries under neoliberalism. The “happiness” she was expected to perform while selling hamburgers in the so-called “Happy Nation” of McDonald’s often led to frustration when her actual emotions couldn’t align with this imposed affect. Many unpleasant experiences stemmed from the dissonance between real-life circumstances and the mandated emotional tone of “happiness.”⁵

That anger moved through Shin Min’s body and took shape as a full-bodied human sculpture, resulting in 〈Part-Time Worker in Downward Dog Pose〉. The yoga posture referenced in the title is often promoted by corporations as helpful for sciatic nerve pain, yet the artist questions the irony of needing to heal oneself from the ailments caused by labor through such exercises. Rather than suggesting that the figure is engaged in a yoga pose, she presents the figure in a posture more akin to a forced kneel—like being pinned down. By sculpting the figure in a McDonald’s uniform, she draws attention to the disparity between how corporations and workers perceive “emotion.” It evokes a situation where structural inequality is endured solely through individual patience, underscoring the emotional dissonance embedded within systems of labor.

Installation view of 《Inhale, Exhale and STAY》(Toy Republic, 2015.8.7.─8.26.) ©Shin Min

《Inhale, Exhale and STAY》(Toy Republic, August 7–26, 2015) was created after she quit McDonald’s. In this exhibition, Shin Min presented figures lying beneath ice cream, headless forms, slumped bodies seated on toilet bowls in workplace restrooms, and dazed figures standing behind cash registers—eyes hollow and tinged with restrained rage. Here, she confronted a reality that remained unchanged despite her departure from McDonald’s. There were always more workers ready to replace her, and she, too, had to take on new forms of labor to survive. Under neoliberalism, the service worker is always destined to lose.⁶ Through this experience, Shin Min realized that her anger could not be directed solely at McDonald’s. She came to understand that her rage stemmed from a tangled web of structural injustices—not just from a single job site.

Following this period, the artist began to look back on the histories and testimonies of marginalized voices within her own communities—voices that have been suppressed under neoliberal society. Through this reflection, she slowly traced the origins of her own anger and sought out ways to give that anger form. One such point of inquiry was the human rights of women who were exploited under the name of “sex labor” during wartime—a form of inhumane violence enacted upon women precisely because they were women. Expressing her rage at this brutal sexual violence, she staged a performance titled 〈Basketball Standards〉(2016). In this work, ten performers, their gender deliberately rendered ambiguous, inserted their necks into basketball backboards and moved across the space. The artist focused on the bodily gestures and the linear narrative structure of the performance.

As her collaborator Kim Joohyun noted, Shin Min recognized that performance is particularly suited for generating “discourses of difference among individuals positioned differently.”⁷ In this piece, she choreographed a process in which bodies slowly break away from imposed forms and are dismantled and reconstituted into other bodily configurations. Unlike sculpture, performance revealed the infinite potential of elastic temporality shaped by the use of space. Having once sculpted bodily forms out of paper, Shin Min gradually shifted to using her own body as material. In works like 〈New Labor Series—VOW Radio〉(2021), a pirate radio broadcast conducted via Instagram Live, and 〈Invisible Semi〉(2022), she actively participated as a performer. In her writing on social media—another form of her artistic output—she reveals her unfiltered self.⁸

This transition reflects how she has continued to subvert the spatial logic of sculpture, which she first embraced, allowing her powerful, large-framed, sharp-eyed figures to infiltrate anywhere, much like a pamphlet-maker would disseminate their message.⁹ To me, this shift reads as an extension of her sculptural practice—a move toward “the body” as a temporal medium unbound by physical space, allowing for flexibility and transformation. It feels like an unequivocally positive gesture: a declaration of the artist’s commitment to solidarity with the world around her. Despite the weight of the mid- to late-2010s—a period marked by the Sewol ferry disaster and the rise of the MeToo movement, events that left her with an enduring sense of helplessness—Shin Min’s work continues to channel those unresolved emotions into forms of expression and action.


 
Making Art with Anger as Fuel

This memory remains a lingering question for the artist—a time unresolved—and continues to act as a driving force that compels her to ask questions and speak out loud. Yet, as the anger that motivates her artistic practice becomes increasingly clarified, one wonders if it also brings her closer to losing the very meaning of making art. For the more closely an artwork touches reality, the less room there is for beauty. Feminist scholar Jung Hee-jin writes, “There is always a distance between writing and the writer. That distance is not tender. The closer it gets, the more antagonistic it becomes. Avoidance, resistance, identification… In order for a person to write about her own reality, she must first cut through an endless entanglement of kudzu vines. One can see the experiences of others, but not even believe her own.”¹⁰ In other words, the more deeply rooted one's positionality is in a lived experience, the more impossible the work becomes—because summoning memories that even the artist herself cannot fully recall requires both relentless self-censorship and crossing emotional abysses.

Even so, Shin Min resolutely states, “Rather than indulging in imaginative fantasy, I’ve always told stories that are closer to reality.” She refuses to abstract or erase the anger of herself and her community, choosing instead to foreground the inherent condition of realism in art.¹¹ In the field of art, realism is often defined as “a representation that allows viewers to recognize what is being depicted,” though it is “not necessarily aimed at replicating what is seen.”¹² In Shin’s realism, the desire to portray the present moment is inevitably imbued with her own subjective perception. That is why she says, “I hope that anyone who sees my work will laugh, talk, relate to it, and feel energized.”¹³ To this end, she not only learned how to see the world through her own eyes, but also continuously contemplated how to allow others to see the world through the eyes of the forms she creates.

She now knows that large, bold figures stationed inside gallery spaces are no longer sufficient to infiltrate the world. Because even the most “open” exhibitions are, in truth, restricted by opening hours—and therefore cannot represent “everyone.”

Shin Min knows this: art cannot change the world. And yet, she continues to make art. Perhaps it is because she believes beauty can compel ethics? Even if no clear answer can be given to that question, I recall the moment when I found her work especially compelling—precisely when the question, “What must an artist be wary of when engaging in social and ethical practice beyond self-representation?” refused to leave my mind. More accurately, it was the memory of the figure seen from behind in Shin Min’s 〈Our Prayer – I do not hate my fellow being / I love / I embrace / I stand in solidarity〉(2022), and the melody of 〈Invisible Semi〉 that resurfaced.

A large-bodied female torso, donning an outdated hairnet—an unfashionable style now rare, yet still worn for “hygiene reasons” or because of “conventional aesthetic standards.” Her clenched lips and determined gaze conveyed something more than mischief—there was resolve. A body, yes—but ultimately, a face composed entirely of the eyes. And a dance: repeated service gestures choreographed to a song, gestures dictated by the service industry. Throughout the work, even though it remained unclear whom the laborer of this era should resist, the moment was vivid: imagining workers breaking the chain of competition and exploitation, rising up and reaching out to grasp one another’s hands.

The moment of resonance came from that fleeting but aching energy evoked by struggle and solidarity. And this energy alone is reason enough to keep engaging with her work. That sufficiency, in whatever form it takes, will undoubtedly reach her—and become another force that sustains her in continuing to make and share her work.

 
 
About IMA Critics

“IMA Critics” is a visual culture research initiative organized by the Ilmin Museum of Art. The project invites critics, writers, and editorial professionals to revisit foundational theories of criticism, gain hands-on experience with discourse production processes, and ultimately generate meaningful outcomes in the field of art writing. In 2023, six researchers—Kim Hae-soo, Park Hyun, Yoon Taegyun, Lee Heejun, Lim Hyunyoung, and Choi Jaeyoon—participated in the program.


 
Park Hyun

Park Hyun is interested in the transformative moments that occur when individual narratives intersect with contemporary society through art, and explores these transitions through writing and curatorial work. She studied Art Studies at Hongik University and earned her MA in Aesthetics with a thesis on the ecological aesthetic potential of Bruno Latour’s Actor-Network Theory. She is currently working as a curator at the National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, Korea.

 
 
1.  Park Hyun, email to Shin Min, September 19, 2023.
2.  I asked Shin Min what she has been most cautious about throughout her self-representational practice from the early stages to the present. In response, she explained her reasoning for incorporating “letter writing” into her work as follows: “A letter has a destination—it is a place for the thoughts written on paper, a destination for the heart. If that destination is myself, the letter cannot arrive. A letter must be addressed to someone else. Putting the thoughts and images I selfishly want to keep to myself into an envelope and sending them off without regret to someone else—that act of letting my feelings flow outward like a letter is something I strive to apply to my work.” Ibid.
3.  Exhibition preface to Daughters with Strawberry Noses (Place MAK, Oct. 18–30, 2011). 2011. URL: https://neolook.com/archives/20111018h.
4.  “Let me be honest. For this exhibition and future works, I had made up my mind to produce neat canvases or solidly built sculptural pieces made from durable materials—artworks that would be perfect for home decor and would entice people to keep buying more. I needed to make money! So I bought oil paints and white canvases. But every time I picked up a pencil and tried to draw in front of those materials, I ended up producing images that were no better than a tiny, embarrassing turd.” Ibid.
5.  See Eiji Otsuka, The Society of Emotionalization, trans. Shin Jung-woo (Seoul: Resiol, 2020), 47.
6.  Referring to service workers as “losers” here is intentional and contextual. According to Otsuka’s argument, neoliberalism is fundamentally grounded in social Darwinism, which carries an implicit agreement that the socially vulnerable are “losers” in a survival competition. When the logic of individual responsibility is turned toward the vulnerable, they are inevitably framed as failures. I agree with this premise and therefore deliberately use the term “loser” to describe service workers in this text. See ibid., 123.
7.  Kim Joohyun, “The War That Never Ends, There Are No Backboards: Shin Min – Basketball Standard,” 2016. URL: https://cargocollective.com/daughternose/2016-2.
8.  Invisible Semi (2022) was a performance presented in conjunction with Shin Min’s solo exhibition Semi at The Great Collection (Sept. 3–Oct. 15, 2022).
9.  Park Hyun, email to Shin Min, September 19, 2023.
10.  Jung Hee-jin, I Write So As Not to Be Defeated by Bad People (Seoul: Gyo-yang-in, 2020), 116.
11. Seoul Museum of Art, “Seoul Museum of Art | Nanji Open Source Studio Talk Program 5. Shin Min,” April 22, 2021. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6Tgr2Vo6Jo.
12.  Kim Jaewon, “Realism in Art.” Korean Modern and Contemporary Art History Review, no. 22 (2011): 72.
13.  Park Hyun, email to Shin Min, September 19, 2023.

References