Installation view of Chung Heeseung 《Dancing Together in Sinking Ship》, Korea Artist Prize 2020 © MMCA

All things that exist have images. As artists, we are forever reaching out to grasp their true nature and their meanings. We define each of the things that our fingertips touch, frustrated at our inadequate vocabulary and style. The relationships and gaps between the essence of these objects and their images, and our ceaseless efforts to capture them: these are the subjects of Chung Heeseung’s photographic inquiry. Going a step further, it can be said her photographs are recognized as complete images in their own right, independent of their subjects. She shows us that photography is not about proving the physical existence of subjects but about granting independence to the properties of images that exist as part them.

Over the past 10 years or so, Chung’s photographs have captured the special feel of various subjects including people, objects and spaces. Beginning with portrait series such as Persona, Reading and Ghost, she has captured historical space in photographs through still life works including Still-Life, Tender Buttons, Rose is Rose is Rose, Disappearance, and Remembrance has rear and front.

It seems appropriate to label Chung’s first series, comprising portrait works, under the common title Persona. As the artist herself has stated, these works explored the relationship between masks and faces, taking people as their subjects. Chung further divides the processes involved in these series, explaining that Persona uses the performance of actors in a tragedy to address the ambiguous boundaries between reality, the stage, absorption and self-revelation, while Reading focuses on and attempts to capture this process whereby actors reading a script repeatedly read out the language of others until it becomes an act of losing themselves Ghost is a reference to mid-19th-century portrait photographs; it investigates the emotion and untraceable nostalgia (which may, according to Walter Benjamin, become an aura) found in works produced in the period of approximately 15 years between the invention of photography and its commercialization.

To create these works, a kind of homage to the emotion of early photographs that has been lost in their counterparts today, Chung used a large camera and sliding plates to produce two stereo images taken at slightly different times and for different durations; this work was done with the production process of 19th-century daguerrotype portraits in mind. The relatively long filming times made the models’ gazes turn further from the camera and towards their inner selves, thereby attempting to get involved with the subject, in contrast to practical and superficial depictions. Referring to these works, Chung has stated that she also depicted surfaces, but that what interested her was those that manifested themselves as symptoms of internally occurring psychological changes.1

Chung Heeseung’s Still-Life works are photographs taken of various objects around her. Here, she presents and arranges them in ways that differ from their original meanings, showing them as unfamiliar images or a single objet; in the Rose is Rose is Rose series, she uses a repetitive series of rose portraits to show the process of photographs approaching the essence of an object. Tender Buttons, produced at a similar time, borrows the title of a poem by Gertrude Stein and attempts to reveal subjects or bodies in fluid, mutually dependent relationships. The subjects of this work are things in a state of tenderness but with loose relationships to the names attached to them; things that are in states of instability but not aggressive.

Tender Buttons is tied together with Rose is Rose is Rose and Disappearance as “three props regarding the impossibility of meaning”; this expression itself is an exploratory work by Chung pertaining to the unreachable meaning of images. These works contain contemplation on the relationships between images and texts found in Chung’s other works, exhibitions and anthologies, and on what lies between the lines therein. Chung has used the act of editing, also an important characteristic of her works, to experiment with the relationship between images and texts. Her arraying and arranging of series of works sometimes displaces single photographs into completely different contexts, and is also an act of creating language-like breaths, akin to a poem. As they walk along the walls of the exhibition space or turn the pages of an anthology, viewers or readers must read the spaces-between-the-lines and breaths that the artist has created.

In an earlier interview, when asked to define the characteristics of photography as a medium, Chung answered, “Photography is hard to define. It has no fixed identity.” The relationship between photographic images and reality was as unstable as a leaky ceiling, she added, and the job of photographs of photographs, ultimately, was to explore these cracks and holes. Her view of the relationship between images and reality seems highly meaningful for us in an age inundated with images, where we have lost all sense of their function, and of that of photographs.

Though photography entered the world less than 200 years ago, it has been analyzed by art historians as a medium in confrontation with painting as a means of reproduction, or from various angles and perspectives including image aesthetics and media theory, since the moment it appeared. In the 20 or 30 years since the emergence of digital photography, its qualities as data have become more important than its material foundations. Photography today is now being reduced to images and data, along with painting, graphics and video, proliferating infinitely and at light speed by way of social media.

It is on the verge of having to choose one of two fates: ignoring these platforms amid the maelstrom and becoming isolated, or colluding with them and being swept away by their speed. In these circumstances, Chung Heeseung keeps on digging down obstinately into the personae and identities of photographic images, prompting us to question the permanence of photography as art. And surely it is our constant questioning of photography that will let it endure as art.


 
1 Chung, Heeseung. Unphotographable (Seoul Doosan Art Center, 2011). See artist’s interview (no page marked).

References