Poster image of 《STOP, and SEE》 © MMCA

“Hope and prospect” and “despair and dejection” would be the words to describe one’s frustration in observing the current status-quo of traditional-style Korean painting, which is straying amidst the swamp of such words as “stagnation,” “rebellion,” and “extension”. Under this circumstance, this exhibition is conceived to “stop” such a bewildered gaze for a moment and “see” into the traditional-style Korean paintings made since the 1960s, focusing on the works classified under the category of “traditional-style Korean painting” in National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art, Korea (MMCA)’s collection which are classified under the category of “traditional-style Korean painting (KO)”.

For we believe that the first step of finding answers with regard to the identity of the field that is classified as “traditional-style Korean painting”, the passage that it has taken, where it heads, and why it heads toward that direction is to “stop” and “see”. The traditional-style painting collection of MMCA consists of 905 works that have been acquired on the basis of strict procedures and well-defined frameworks in terms of periods, and it is thus enables one's in-depth understanding of the overall passage of modern and contemporary traditional-style Korean painting as well as the Museum’s agenda for artwork acquisition.
 
In 1915, which is a hundred years ago, Goh Huidong (1886-1965) graduated from the Department of Western Painting, Tokyo School of Fine Arts, and with this there was born the first Korean painter of Western-style painting. In 1925, which was a decade later since then, Goh turned to traditional-style Korean painting and that year was the year when Western-style paintings by Kim Gyujin (1868-1933) were being shown at the Joseon pavilion in the Osaka International Exposition.
 
Where does "traditional-style Korean painting" stands in the present-day Korean contemporary art scene in 2015? The term "traditional-style Korean Painting" was originally adopted to refer exclusively to those Korean paintings that carried on the legacy of traditional Korean painting of that time when foreign artistic tendencies were introduced and integrated into the then Korean pictorial practices.

Yet, today, questions are being raised regarding the aptness of the term to describe the new stylistic tendencies that has been emerged after going through the turbulent process of amalgamation, and there is also a high demand to redefine the identity of traditional-style Korean painting. Besides these problems with regard to the use of the term and its identity, there are many other conundrums confronting traditional-style Korean painting: the stagnation of the art market; the art education system that aggravates the alienation of traditional-style Korean painting; the problem of authenticity in the area of traditional-style Korean painting.

The weight of such conundrums is so heavy that the field is being deemed as "stagnant", and yet today’s traditional-style Korean painters have been successfully communicating with contemporaries through their original voices which they have established by drawing inspirations from tradition despite aforementioned disadvantageous circumstances.  This loudly indicates that the field of traditional-style Korean painting had passed the stages of the ideological following of traditional painting and the experimental reception of foreign tendencies.

Those artists have endured the ferocious period during which the bubbles of the boom of traditional-style Korean painting of the 1970s burst and built their own worlds by strengthening their pictorial languages and broadening their perspectives. And what needs to be done now are to reassess their artistic endeavors, to activate and bolster discourses on the new identity of traditional-style Korean painting, to locate it in the history of Korean art and to ponder upon which path the education of it should take, and to discover ways through which traditional-style Korean painting can breathe together with the life of present-day Koreans.
 
《MMCA Collection Highlights part Ⅰ: STOP, and SEE》 is the first show of MMCA’s series exhibition project on traditional-style Korean painting. Featuring works made during the period from the 1960s to 2015, it is divided into five sections: "See the Invisible" whose theme is abstraction; "See the People" focusing on figure paintings; "See the Life" casting light on history and life; "See Nature" whose subject matters are natural landscapes and flowers and birds; lastly, "See the Boundary" consisting of works whose mediums are extended to include those other than traditional ones such as paper, brushes, and ink.
 
​The primary significance of traditional-style Korean painting lied not in its materials of paper, brushes, and ink but in its close connection to the lives of Koreans. Like the Daejojeon Hall at Changdeokgung Palace, the empty walls of old palaces were filled with works by the master artists of the time, not a shabby picture of the deceased surrounded by an excessive number of flowers but a portrait painted in the conventional portrait manner was used in funerals and ancestral rites, and people enjoyed paintings celebrating the life while giving names to their houses and rooms.

And it is in this cultural milieu that traditional Korean painting was born. The stagnation of traditional-style Korean painting was accompanied by the disappearance of such cultural practices. Today's traditional-style Korean painting has a task on hand to restore its original function to be together with our lives, which is totally different from attempting to win the highest prizes in world-famous biennales.
 
Unlike the word "end", the word "stop" assumes "before" and "after" it. MMCA is planning to present Part Ⅱ of this project, which will look into its collection of traditional-style Korean paintings from the modern period to the 1960s, at MMCA, Deoksugung. These two shows aim to examine grouping of important works carefully selected from the collection consisting of 905 traditional-style Korean paintings, and the resulting outputs will be fed into the Museum's exhibition programs and acquisition processes in relation to traditional-style Korean painting and contribute to the deepening of viewers' understanding of it, to the formation of discourses on related fields, and further to the fostering of a cultural environment in which traditional-style Korean painting takes a salient part.

References