Yoon Dongchun, Sansil – Munhori 54-4, 2017, C-print, 42 x 29 cm each x (100) © Yoon Dongchun

Not long ago, I came across a feature article published by Artnet, headquartered in New York, in which sixteen contemporary artists were asked to predict what art might look like 100 years from now. Their responses ranged from deeply earnest reflections to playfully inventive speculations. Reading it, I was reminded of my own long-held view on art.

In the beginning, humanity knew only life for the sake of survival. Over time, in the process of sharing and collectively enjoying things deemed good, art began to take root. It was nurtured, refined, and cultivated. After hundreds of thousands of years, art eventually assumed the form we recognize today. This development involved identifying what was meaningful or worthy of special recognition within everyday life, naming it, classifying its characteristics, and assigning it value. The Western concept of genre emerged through this process. In other words, art and its genres were painstakingly separated from the necessities of survival. Thus, the history of art has also been a history of “departure from the everyday.”

Although art exists for humanity, we sometimes — or often — forget this. The internal logic of art can grow so dominant that it obscures its fundamental purpose. A representative example is “art for art’s sake.” Since the modern era, we have long been burdened by this dogma; its traces likely linger in many minds. Fortunately, however, humanity is wise and appears to be charting a more rightful course. The concept of genre, once so carefully distinguished and preserved, is now being boldly discarded in favor of more effective expression and more open communication.

Art, which once broke away from everyday life and soared endlessly skyward, is gradually returning to our side. We already sense countless signs of this shift in every direction. I dare say that the history of contemporary art traces a path of “return to the everyday.” The greater the distance that once separated them, the slower the recovery may be.

If a special value is shared and enjoyed by all, it ceases to be special; it becomes ordinary. Therefore, art must become everyday life. It must become a spirited life in which everyone shares and delights in what is good. Like the air we need to breathe each day, art should fill our surroundings completely. Like the daily act of eating, it should become routine. Perhaps in 100 years, art as we know it today — art as a form of communication mediated by the transmission of emotion — will disappear. Each person will live as the sovereign subject of their own life.

At that time, art will already be everyday life. And that will mark art’s final inversion — an ultimate reversal defined by the overturning of value itself.

References