Installation view of 《Le Vide》 © GALLERY KICHE

GALLERY KICHE presents Lee Byungho’s solo exhibition 《Le Vide》 from November 10 to December 10.

An exhibition by Yves Klein, which caused considerable controversy in 1958 when he placed a large cabinet in an otherwise empty gallery in Paris in an attempt to make the invisible visible, served as one of the key motifs in the early development of Lee’s practice. The so-called silicone works that first brought the artist to the attention of the art world likewise sought to visualize air itself and temporality by using mechanical devices to trap air within specific forms and repeatedly contract and expand them.

At the same time, however, these works led the artist to recognize that his reliance on mechanical devices meant that what he sought to reveal could not be made visible without presupposing a physical surface—in other words, materiality. This realization prompted him to reconsider the starting point of his practice. Here, that starting point refers to the artistic question that has long concerned him: how might the invisible realm be evoked through the language of sculpture?

In 《Le Vide》, Lee turns his attention to the sculptural methods employed in the process of taxidermy before the skin is applied. Central to this process is the transformation of a single reproduced form into an infinite variety of possible shapes. His attempt to create substitutes without skin—forms stripped of their outer surface—stems from a desire to give sculptural form to something amorphous that exists beyond the representational framework of outward appearance.

In this sense, the works may be understood as incomplete “sculptures as process,” following the method of constructing taxidermy forms only up to the stage immediately before the final skin is applied. By presenting the works in an ongoing state in which completion is deliberately deferred, the artist believes they can ultimately open up the possibility of infinite expansion unconstrained by time or place.

To make the invisible visible is, in itself, an oxymoron. In this respect, the artist’s seemingly reckless attempts come close to failures undertaken for the sake of failure itself. By deliberately enacting this process of self-imposed frustration, Lee seeks to share a fundamental artistic question: “Is it possible to achieve a ‘sculptural capture’ of the formless—something without a fixed shape, something perpetually in process?”

References