Eun Chun, The Photography Is the Retina of Scholars – Jeong Seong-Hun’s Telescope, 2012, Archival pigment print, 75 x 90 cm © Eun Chun

The pleasure of looking at cameras rather than photographs can be compared to that of the pleasure of looking at a map, rather than the actual journey itself. Rather than being “there”, the pleasure is in imaging and desiring that moment. This pleasure is for daydreamers, not explorers.
– Quoted from The photography is the retina of scholars by Eun Chun

While flipping through pages of A certain photograph (2015), I encountered a photo at the almost at the end of the book, which was attached to the page with a piece of adhesive tape at the center of its back. A few days later, I carefully took off the adhesive tape that has been stuck between the photo and the page, and I put the photo on the wall in front of my desk.

“I selected one photo. Can I share this with Minju and Hyunjoo? At the bottom of the photo are tree branches neatly coming up like candles put on a cake. On the top are three trees opening their arms toward the sky. The sun shines toward this direction. And it was August then.” On the next page of where the photo has been put, there was a writing about the image, written by Eun Chun.

The book includes letters to seven people written by Minju and Hyunjoo, who are twin sisters with visual impairment, after they have read writings by other seven people about one photo. In the sixth book of ‘Float’ Series published by Hezuk Press, there is also a writing and photos by Chun. The title of the book is Le repos incomplet (2017). “I went to a studio that had been used by a sculptor. On a shelf were a pile of plaster models.

Masses with different shapes. I was told that the masses were everything that the sculptor had left. The fingertips of the sculptor must have touched the surfaces of the masses.” Chun wrote a text about a deep crevice between photography as halted image and time as living moment by layering her thoughts on the figure of a lying sculptor, a disappeared sculptor, and her hands that resemble those of the sculptor. She photographed everything that had been left by the disappeared sculptor.

The photographer’s writing questions about where the “living time” slips away in a single photographic image that is like “a moment of floating in the air”. “Rodin said the opposite. Artists are real and photography is a liar. In reality, time doesn’t stop. (…) The moment when all four legs of a horse run floating in the air is fake.”

It seemed that Eun Chun wanted to find the nuances of the words “to see” and “to understand” from the delicate gap between “seeing” and “understanding” photographic images. Did she believe that the “knowledge” about the living time kept by a photo as a halted image can often become a text that keeps a secret about an uncertain event?

Chun’s photography overlaps with profound discussions about “recognition” by Roland Barthes for many times and often comes across with such discussions. Barthes said that photography is painful work for him. He left fundamental questions about photography when he organized photos of his deceased mother, asking if he could recognize them well and if they could be seen as proper photos to other people.

Chun’s photos also share the same questions, tracing the transparent evidences of disappeared beings that have been left in a halted image like the photo from a greenhouse that Barthes selected as a proper image about his mother (a photo showing his mother and her older brother in front of a greenhouse in a garden in 1898 when she was five years old.) “I saw something like that.” “I did it after seeing something like that. I don’t remember all the other things.” (Comments by people that became visually impaired adventitiously, featured in Geum-gok, the memorious

The traces of disappeared beings might keep the secret of time that connects images and beings. Barthes endured the pain of “recognition” after his mother’s death to select “a proper photo of his mother” among all the phots about her. I assume that Chun selected (the format of) writing to come close to the conditions of “proper photography” where she can enumerate such situations of beings from her photos using subjective words, similar to what Barthes did.

When Chun was planning the book Geum-gok, the memorious (2016), she med eleven adventitiously visually impaired people in their sixties that live in Geum-gok. “When I asked them what was particularly memorable from what they had seen before losing sight.” Chun put one black and white photo of Geum-gok’s scenery on the front cover of the book.

Inside the book was filled with questions to the visually impaired and their answers in written text and braille. As a photographer, Chun pushes the antiquitated idea of photography about the objectiveness of images, which often leads us to ask if certain images are “real,” into the Barthesian labyrinth. As Barthes thought that every photo creates a labyrinth, those that are put in the labyrinth are busy finding themselves as being Ariadne in a maze instead of pursuing “the truth.”

Thus, the hollow photographic image on the front cover of Geum-gok, the memorious occupy our gaze that has been wandering in different space and time with labyrinthine narratives of imperfect memories of objects that some have seen, taking it back into the photo once again. While I’m trapped in the labyrinth of photography, what takes me back to the photo is the photographer’s writing that enumerate words that resemble a firm and long rope that took Ariadne from a maze.

“Hyunjoo advised me to draw things appearing in a photo on her palm, as a photographer that taught her about photography did. (…) ‘There are things in a photo that you can never know without seeing.’ Then, Hyunjoo, who sometimes become too clear about things, said. ‘Give it up. Just give up anything like that.’”

In 《The photography is the retina of scholars》 (2014), the photographer (Eun Chun) focused on the perspectives of great dreamers (nine amateur astronomers) that were imagining the hidden reality of the world. She did so by borrowing the words by an astronomer that photographed the surface of the Sun (Jules Janssen).

In the work, Chun observes how amateur astronomers produce their equipment to measure and capture astronomical phenomena. She then apprehends that the figures captured from the darkness through such equipment are not real but the presentation of the gaze into the labyrinth.

In all these processes, the photographer’s writing slips from the surface of the photo to the space beyond it as the imagination of the great dreamers do, making it possible for the living time to flow by providing a narrative.

References