Poster image of 《Equation》 © KT&G SangsangMadang

We live in an age when visual art is no longer first read through the eyes, and even the act of seeing requires the consent of others. The contradictory process by which concepts and values govern intuition and sensation resembles the misconception that every play is produced solely according to a script. A script is merely a precise record of a well-made play.

Photography no longer necessarily involves a pursuit of truth. The boundaries between media have disappeared as if they had never existed, and human capabilities seem too insignificant for the camera to be described as merely a machine. Questions concerning photography as a tool have likewise lost much of their significance.

Installation view of 《Equation》 © KT&G SangsangMadang

At first glance, separating “seeing” from “knowing” may seem impossible. Yet, both linguistically and visually, remaining unbound by intention, meaning, form, and boundaries continues to be one of my greatest challenges. To this end, I began by delaying the processes of recognition and interpretation, allowing the viewer to remain in a state of pure visual perception.

In other words, I present multiple distinct images simultaneously within a single frame and experiment with collisions and interactions between them by employing physical, chemical, and cognitive forms of interference in Equation, Cacophony, and Arithmetic (collectively referred to as the 'Equation' series). Through this process, I seek to expand a realm that resists easy conceptual definition. 

Throughout this process, there are two questions I have frequently been asked. One is, “How was it made?”—a question about methodology. In fact, this body of work does not involve the reliable processes commonly shared in traditional photography, so the question is a natural one. In traditional photography, the answer to this question is largely determined at the moment the photograph is taken.

By contrast, this work takes the photographed image itself as its point of departure. In other words, the camera and photography no longer exist in a relationship of necessary and sufficient conditions.

Installation view of 《Equation》 © KT&G SangsangMadang

Another question is, “What is this?” Photography, one of the most effective media for representing objects, has earned a firm degree of trust in its subordinate role to the subjects it depicts.

Yet, with the exception of certain conceptual practices, the closer representation comes to its subject, the more tightly photography becomes confined within this hierarchical relationship. ‘Equation’ breaks from the past in order to dismantle the traditional functions of photography and the expectations attached to them.

Beginning with a question about the gap between “seeing” and “knowing,” the work has expanded toward transforming subjects represented as figurative images into abstract ones. Multiple individual images lose their respective hierarchies and values through relationships of collision and coexistence, functioning instead as uniform elements.

In this process, the one-sidedness of existing value systems is disrupted, while each image acquires an equal aesthetic value as a visual element. In other words, things once fixed within a linguistic system are reduced to a state without value or function.

Installation view of 《Equation》 © KT&G SangsangMadang

'Equation' stands in opposition to the conventional photographic process—that is, the realization of an intended image. It excludes photography’s narrative, design-oriented, informational, and documentary functions, while seeking to distance itself as much as possible from playful processes driven by personal taste.

If there is one intention, it is that images carrying different messages come together within a single frame and, as a whole, generate an entirely different message. In this process, the images themselves naturally persuade the maker and gradually give form to the work. With no predetermined direction, the result exists as yet another process that reveals the process itself.

The clarity of a subject can sometimes become a blind spot in itself. This is especially true in photography, where the subject matter often becomes synonymous with the theme. If something that is not photography is made through photography, is it still photography?

In other words, when substances composed of a single material are mixed together, can their sum move beyond the nature of the original material? It is this possibility that interests me.

I hope that even the conventional assumption that this enigmatic work can only be defined by relying on its own background or source will ultimately prove untenable.

References