Poster image of 《Private, but Public Square》 © Wumin Art Center

When metaphorical rhetoric surrounding emerging allegations is reduced to simile in reality and reveals a dark, tangible form before our eyes, ruptures in everyday life expose the bare face of a society that has remained hidden, bringing us closer to truths we have long endeavored to overlook by drawing ambiguous boundaries around what belongs to others as “personal” or “private.”

This provisional screen has functioned as a convenient excuse for relieving the burden of collective responsibility, whether direct or indirect, for the fundamental problems underlying such events, in proportion to the narrowing distance from which reality is perceived. From a relative perspective, the binary logic of public and private spheres, whose boundaries between inside and outside remain ambiguous, may itself constitute a form of negative-pressure isolation intended to prevent the unsettling atmosphere pervading our society from intruding upon everyday life.

We have merely wished to deny what we already know: the archetypes of the chronic maladies and structural violence from which contemporary society “suffers.” Beginning from the seemingly self-evident premise that no issue is entirely personal or private, the exhibition examines how individual and social problems are interconnected, moving in reverse from a microscopic perspective toward a macroscopic one.


Youngle Keem, The Cares of a Family Man, 2016, Continuous projection of 80 text slides, 2 min 30 sec © Youngle Keem

Dong-ryung Kim’s American Alley captures the lives of women in military camp towns and invites viewers to reconsider the darker side of Korean society and its social ethics. Beginning with the personal story of a grandmother who lost her husband in the Jeju April 3 Incident, Im Heung-soon attempts a historical approach to a tragic event in Korea’s past. Sojung Jun focuses on people who quietly continue their work amid the rapid modernization of Korean society, drawing attention to disappearing traditions and the value of labor.

At the point where the individual and society meet, Jungkyun Shin identifies concrete clues as to how systems of political symbolism shape collective or individual identities, retrieving traces of free-floating anxiety. Through The Cares of a Family Man, Youngle Keem recreates a room filled with words describing the psychology of a middle-class man whose life collapsed during the Asian financial crisis, examining the emotions and attitudes of a family breadwinner confronting the social and economic crises of the 1990s.

Kira Kim’s A Weight of Ideology summons the scars of state violence buried in the individual unconscious through the testimony of a person under hypnosis. Biho Ryu’s Inner View rewinds the process of compassion and grief for those wounded by disasters produced by large-scale industrial society.

In Walk, Youngtaeg Ko focuses on the expressive gestures of the hands of two people walking together, nearly touching yet never quite meeting; amid a continuing tension between tranquility and unease, the work metaphorically evokes the reality of Korea’s division, in which the two ultimately fail to become one.

Kelvin Kyung Kun Park’s Cheonggyecheon Medley addresses the transhistorical meanings surrounding iron, beginning with the artist’s family history across three generations—himself, his father, and his grandfather—and extending to the collective experience of national modernization and the industrialization undertaken for colonial exploitation during the Japanese occupation.

In this way, the exhibition looks into the room of a family breadwinner who endured the Asian financial crisis of the 1990s and listens to the voice of a victim who lost a beloved family member in a disaster from the recent past. It considers the confession of a grandmother who lost her husband in the Jeju April 3 Incident and the arduous lives of women in military camp towns, tracing the historical circumstances and social events that left indelible pain and scars upon individual lives.

Through the artists’ works, the exhibition does not seek to provoke hasty emotional identification with the wounds left upon individual lives. Rather, it remains wary of the deception involved in imagining another person’s pain and reveals the limitations that inevitably confine us to the position of observers.

Yet it also hopes to encourage a proper recognition that the existential limitation preventing human beings from fully immersing themselves in the pain of others cannot justify indifference toward the wounds of those with whom we share the present; a reasonable suspicion that even the existential impulse to close one’s eyes to surrounding circumstances and survive at any cost may have helped pave a well-maintained road to hell; and a reconsideration of the fact that the self may at any moment cease to be exempt from the fortune of remaining “the other.”

References