Installation view of 《Oh, Night and I’ll Come to You》 © Hapjungjigu

This exhibition is about “darkness.” 《Oh, Night and I’ll Come to You》—the title itself makes that clear. The sentence is a promise made to someone. It calls out to the one who is in the dark, extending a hand to someone crouched within it—a tender promise. This promise may sound firm and trustworthy, or it may sound hollow and sorrowful. Either way, what matters is that it is a promise. Yet to promise a journey toward someone, this darkness, this night, is a truly trembling and desolate time. The gaze that pushes through that trembling, fear, helplessness, and loneliness toward somewhere else—this is likely the shared point of view of Yuja and Jungyeon¹, and the point of departure for this exhibition.

The emotional register of night runs through both the title of Yuja’s photograph (Night Writing) and Jungyeon’s two-channel video (Night Piece). In the large photograph Night Writing(2024), hung prominently on the window, a girl is captured whistling with her fingers. “Night writing” refers to a coded system devised by Charles Barbier for military operations, a system that later contributed to the invention of Braille.

Composed of twelve dots, this writing enabled silent communication on dark battlefields, and Braille for the visually impaired was born from this very possibility of connection in darkness. “Night piece,” meanwhile, refers to a literary genre in medieval literature that deals with accidental and uncanny events. Often classified as “Gothic” or “Gothic fiction,” night pieces center on mysterious incidents and unknown fears that occur at night, invariably accompanied by solitary figures seized by anxiety and hallucinations summoned by darkness.²

Sending a message to someone in the dark, or staring into the darkness while waiting for someone to appear, is an old melancholic figure—waiting for a distant lover, a comrade lying in ambush, or someone who has departed.

According to Yuja and Jungyeon, “darkness” here serves as a metaphor for a sense of the end of the world. Images that convey “the end as a finely spreading vibration, an apocalyptic sensation that is fatal yet at the same time fragile, enveloping us through delicate gestures”³ form a particular landscape. To state it hastily, this landscape is a dim scene of girls living amid loss and wounds. In fact, night or darkness is not an independent or positive entity in itself. Ontologically speaking, darkness does not exist as a substance; it is merely the absence of light. Darkness is not simply dimness, but the loss of light; the end is not merely an ending, but the loss of the future. The apocalyptic sensation that seeps out tremblingly from a negated future—a future faded more into memory than dream—is nothing other than a sensation of loss.

Meanwhile, this exhibition composed of Yuja’s photographs and Jungyeon’s videos appears as though two fragments—day and night—have been stitched together. Though captured at different times of day and featuring different subjects, both attempt to grasp the invisibility beyond what is seen, resembling “light-images” that seek what lies beyond. It hardly needs to be reiterated that the word “photograph” itself means “drawing with light (phos + graphê).”

Jungyeon’s videos also consciously evoke optical gazes that emit light in darkness, such as surveillance CCTV cameras or night-vision imagery. Yuja’s photographs are mostly placed on the first floor near the storefront windows, while Jungyeon’s videos—except for Night Piece—are screened underground. Yuja’s camera fixes scenes that scatter like foam in the dazzling brightness of broad daylight, while Jungyeon’s camera captures the gazes and movements of “animal-like” girls crouched in caves or wandering through the dark night outside. Yet the two practices do not appear contrived or oppositional, perhaps because both evoke a desire to glimpse “light” within “darkness.”

It is difficult to read desire from photographs. More broadly, one cannot expect to extract emotion from photographs—except in cases where viewers react reflexively or empathetically to subjects such as a crying person or a smiling child. Even photographs that depict clear misery do not emit emotion in and of themselves. I dislike invoking Roland Barthes’s concept of the punctum in relation to photographs. While not entirely unfounded, it is not something objectively or interpretively discoverable on the smooth surface of a photograph for everyone, regardless of details.

Still, if one were to defend the punctum, it would be a rupture of memory or a piercing of emotion arising precisely at the point where interpretation fails. And yet—paradoxical as it may sound—I believe photographs do contain emotion. By emotion, I mean not sentimentality, but a “structure of feeling” shared by certain groups of people, a numb desire. In the context of photography, this is akin to a quiet disturbance caused by the light of the moment the photograph captures. This disturbance is not the light itself, but the subtle vibration inscribed in the eyes, forehead, fingertips, or nape upon which the light settles. There are moments when we cannot tear our eyes away from such vibrations in a photograph.

In Will o’the wisp(2023), hung on the side window of the exhibition space, rows of empty desks are reflected beyond a hazy pane of glass. In Oh, Night and I’ll Come to You(2024), which shares its title with the exhibition, light floats like fine down, forming white outlines as if washing away darkness. In We Ring the Bell and Walk(2022), a photograph developed from accidentally burned film, autumn leaves and fireflies scatter like a tomb of light across a deep, abyssal blue sky.

Yuja’s photographs bear traces of things that undoubtedly existed but could not be fully recorded. These traces—submerged in light or darkness—are powerless and sorrowful, yet piercingly radiant. Though I hesitate to cite Barthes, his expression is too precise to omit: a photograph is “a treasury of rays emitted on that very day” by a being now vanished, and the vitality of a photograph reaches us “not through added light, but through its own rays.”⁴

In scenes captured by Yuja and Jungyeon, white clothing—and girls dressed in white—appear with striking frequency. One might question the need to assign meaning to the color of clothing, yet the white light captured by the camera evokes, on one hand, the solemn and pure child acolytes of Catholic Mass, and on the other, cold and unreal ghosts. In particular, Jungyeon’s video The Minotaur Was the First Child to Fall into the Labyrinth features a girl with large eyes and an expressionless face.

As we follow her wandering through underground roads, karaoke rooms, and city streets, our attention shifts less to curiosity about her origins than to her small body contrasted against vast spaces. Whether filled with noise or echoing only with solitary footsteps, every space becomes a hollow “labyrinth” to her. A numb, drifting expression; a slow, animal-like gait that continues despite sensing the absence of an exit. The video follows her slowly through CCTV-like perspectives and night-vision imagery. When her eyes meet the camera, the flashing red light is at once animalistic and distinctly ghostly.

The dead float as light, while the living crouch like decaying corpses. 《Semele’s Light》 compresses the suspense of Gothic fiction into the narrow, dark confines of urban studio apartments, vividly revealing the sense of enclosure and isolation left to the living. The myth of Semele—who was burned to ashes the moment she beheld Zeus’s light—is translated into the figure of a contemporary girl suffering from PTSD, confined to her bed and addicted to the glow of screens.

The death of others exists outside us as an object of voyeurism, yet also as an unbearable trauma and pain that cannot be confronted head-on. At the same time, it sinks deep within us. Yet when the flickering light of the screen spreads across the face of the girl lying sideways in the dark, we discover not curiosity but resolve in her expression. “At the very center of burning pain, Semele does not close her eyes for a single moment.”⁵

I may be forcing a connection between their works and the emotion of loss. I may even be insisting that Yuja’s photographs and Jungyeon’s videos emit a certain emotional light—that of a nocturne in which darkness is arriving, rays of trembling twilight. Perhaps this insistence stems from the line by T.S. Eliot cited in the exhibition preface: “This is the way the world ends / Not with a bang but a whimper.”

Rather than a spectacular apocalypse of asteroid impacts or grand catastrophes, we are led to imagine an ending that rots, decays, and festers—an ending that progresses without a bang, but with anxious noise and intermittent vibrations, like air leaking out or ice melting. For us (whoever this “we” may be), grand declarations such as “the end is coming” or “the world has ended” are no longer necessary. What do I mean? Let me mimic Nietzsche’s tone: “That old saint in the forest has not yet heard the news that God is dead!”⁶

The world has already ended, and we live on in its aftermath as if in an appendix. This sensation rings in our ears like tinnitus. The apocalypse has become everyday life. How might we name this? “Our” world sank once eleven years ago, and suffocated again three years ago. In between, smaller worlds we assumed to be safely beside us collapsed and disappeared without sound. We all carry the anniversary of a friend’s death. The repetition of life and death is no longer an aporia of famous philosophers, but something like the tolling of a bell that sounds whenever we begin to forget—like an announcement for a delayed train. And yet, we watch this decaying end. In the darkness where bells ring, we stubbornly open our eyes once more. We count the dates. As Barthes said, dates belong to photographs because they “raise their heads and make us reckon with life and death, the ruthless disappearance of generations.”⁷


 
¹ The artists are Yuja Kim and Jungyeon Kim. Having followed their work for some time, I have largely lost the distance typically maintained between critic and artist; in this text, that loss of distance is not incidental, and thus I refer to them by their first names.
² Jungyeon, who dresses in a “Gothic lolita” style, is an avid reader of Gothic novels.
³ From Jungyeon Kim’s exhibition preface for 《Oh, Night and I’ll Come to You》.
⁴ All quotations from Roland Barthes, Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, trans. Kim Woong-kwon, Dongmunseon, 2006, p. 104.
⁵ From text appearing in Jungyeon Kim’s Semele’s Light.
⁶ Original text: “That old saint in the forest has not yet heard the news that God is dead!” Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, trans. Jung Dong-ho, Chaegsesang, 2000, p. 16.
⁷ Barthes, Camera Lucida, p. 107.

References