Kim Shinrok × Son Hyunseon, Absent Time © Sejong Center for the Performing Arts

Kim Shinrok × Son Hyunseon’s Absent Time ultimately pursues the medium of theater. This is possible because Kim Shinrok accepts Son Hyunseon’s work as a task, and as a result, the work is incorporated into the present as a backdrop or object that organically connects with existence. How Son Hyunseon’s works, which ‘cast themselves’ upon the stage, are treated, and how they are included within the world of the play, determines whether they function as pure backgrounds or as imperfect points of departure. The fact that they emerge somewhat awkwardly, rather than seamlessly, reveals not the impossibility of collaboration but certainly the difficulties inherent in it.

The text regarding Transparent-Body (gel medium on transparent film, 2024, dimensions variable) reads more like an abstract poem at first, which seems intended to converge, to some degree, with the recursive nature of the artwork itself. Standing before Transparent-Body, Kim Shinrok’s narration refers to the ‘transparent’ integration of their own body, and ultimately, the body that exists as a translation, explanation, or expression of Transparent-Body concludes with the utterance of the artwork’s caption information, as if the body is absorbed back into Transparent-Body, acting as its proxy or substitute. In short, it erases the distance between Transparent-Body and the body, treating the body itself as if it were transparent.

While this could be considered a gesture of respect and a performative homage to the work, it also takes on a peculiar dimension. Since this is expressed through spoken text, the final utterance of the caption, “Kim Shinrok,” should replace the conclusion. The notion that the artwork title has read itself is based, of course, on Kim Shinrok’s ghostly presence—on Kim Shinrok becoming a ghost. To be precise, the correct, complete caption should begin with “Son Hyunseon,” but this is omitted. Is it an exaggeration to view this act of caption-reading as a safeguard for establishing an equal footing in the collaboration?

If the incomplete caption serves as a ritual to firmly distinguish Son Hyunseon’s work as “artwork,” then perhaps the absent names “Kim Shinrok” and “Son Hyunseon” are excluded to avoid transgressing the boundaries of Absent Time. Nevertheless, could this omission be the decisive clue revealing that it is not Son Hyunseon’s work or Kim Shinrok’s theater that constitute the artwork, but rather Son Hyunseon and Kim Shinrok themselves who have become the artwork? Rather than the work itself, is the context surrounding this project perhaps inclined toward the star-like presence of “Kim Shinrok”? What matters, therefore, is evaluating Kim Shinrok’s trajectory as an artist and creator—what path they have walked, and what significance this work holds within that trajectory. As stated at the outset, Absent Time extends into the stage as Kim Shinrok’s theatrical platform, with Son Hyunseon’s work accepted as a task to be carried. Even if Son Hyunseon’s works are decisive, it is Kim Shinrok who ultimately extends them purely into performance.

Transparent-Body appears once more at the end to close the play, but it is not strictly connected to the theatrical narrative. The textual purity of Transparent-Body is preserved. It does not seamlessly blend with the rest. What occupies the middle—what takes up most of the duration—is the decisive text of playwright Kim Yeonjae. Is that text itself titled Absent Time? Or has this collaboration merely circled around a promotional model typical of contemporary art? The play’s text is fragmented and treated as such. It disperses throughout the space, much like Son Hyunseon’s works are dispersed across the theater, deriving from the performers’ actions. The absence of a stage is decisive—it reveals the “absent time” of this theater.

Rather than a singular, constructed stage organizing the multilayered nature of the world, the dispersed objects and the bodies wandering among them—filling the empty spaces throughout the theater—become the stage. As the bodies act as substitutes for the stage, Absent Time becomes, true to its title, a time that erases itself, a time that witnesses its own disappearance.

At this point, closely handling the play's text itself does not seem particularly crucial. Rather than purely implementing its content, the text exists as a kind of appropriation to demonstrate how it is treated. If Son Hyunseon’s works are the visible task, then Kim Yeonjae’s play becomes the invisible task. That task functions as a kind of proof regarding the actor, regarding the very nature of performance itself.

This can be summarized into a few techniques: speech that follows a simulation where words are thrown slowly toward a distant space, speaking methods that result from a sharp balancing act between bodily relaxation and extension, the concretization of speech through non-ordinary vocabulary expressed as utterances—all these elements come into play. Though labeled under the director’s domain, Kim Shinrok appears to occupy an ambiguous or faintly drawn position as an expanded actor, who prioritizes testing their own performative domain by incorporating differences in each actor's share of responsibility.

Broadly speaking, the characters seem to share a deep layer of time, a stratum of old memories, and as this disperses throughout the space, vague correlations of different relationships are physically enacted. (One might wonder whether this fragmentation originates from an inherently dispersed text, or whether it results from intentionally fragmenting the text for spatial dispersion.) Direct connections emerge as tightly interwoven interactions between bodies, forming a stark contrast to the otherwise diffused relationships. These memories are presented through leaps in time, and while actor Jo Yeonhee, who appears first, struggles with the confusion of rapid temporal compression, those unaware of the time shift maintain their presence in the past. Notably, the present state of the child version of Kim Shinrok incorporates the identity of the child, adding a unique resonance to Kim Shinrok’s otherness, which reverberates peculiarly across all the characters.

The rough narrative—where the wife, who suffered violence from the dog seller, turns out to be Kim Shinrok’s friend, and upon discovering this, Kim Shinrok kills the dog seller, who had always seduced and clung to her, and joins her friend—is not conveyed with clarity. Fiction, by being witnessed directly in front of one’s eyes, asserts its fictionality as the viewer’s domain—the fourth wall is so close and distinct that it seems to replace the content altogether. In other words, the fragments of narrative unfold less through development and more through physical imprinting, quickly disappearing as each character's portion of responsibility is treated and performed.

Kim Shinrok × Son Hyunseon, Absent Time © Sejong Center for the Performing Arts

Absent Time stitches together the shares of various collaborators, dismantling a single play, and then kneads different shares like dough around the beginning and end. In the middle, Son Naye, participating as dramaturg, takes the baton from Kim Shinrok and reads aloud the play's text—this can be seen as re-naming the entire production as a reading performance. Furthermore, it quietly reminds us that this was, after all, a reading theater production. (Indeed, one could view this piece not as a conventional play with characters, but as a reading theater where individuals primarily voice the text. At the same time, as the performativity of acting comes to the forefront, the share of the play as a representation becomes more pronounced.)

Conversely, one could say that visual artworks, as physical fragments, are accompanied by the play text as traces, as remnants, as extended fragments. Yet somehow, this experiment feels more familiar than experimental—not because the acting style, collaboration, or incorporation of visual artworks is inherently new, but because all these elements fail to coalesce into one unified domain.

If the purpose of the collaboration from the beginning was to organically produce correlated outcomes, it might have been better not to explicitly declare the works as “visual artworks.” Alternatively, if the departure point was the visual artworks themselves, then perhaps the play should have been rewritten independently with a different, distinct share. Is that a matter of utilization? Or does it stem from another temporal disjunction in communication? Transparent texts and opaque texts—though the aim seems to be making everything transparent—never truly converge. Artificial stitching leaves visible seams.

References